Saturday, August 22, 2015

Mohammed Was a Pig

Israeli police arrested a fourth person for calling Mohammed a pig. Avia Morris, the first person arrested described being taunted with cries of “Allahu Akbar”  and “Kill the Jews” along with signs of support for ISIS. But it only became a legal matter when the twenty-year-old woman retorted, “Mohammed is a pig.”

Calling for the death of infidels isn’t a crime. Insulting Mohammed is.

Avia got off lucky. When a young woman named Tatiana Soskin drew Mohammed as a pig scrawling in a Koran, the Clinton administration was more outraged by this than by the World Trade Center bombing.

Its spokesman said that it gave “great thought to this… at the very highest levels of our government.”

It denounced the “outrageous, crude and sick portrayal of the Prophet Mohammed” and claimed, “This woman is either sick or she is evil… she deserves to be put on trial for these outrageous attacks on Islam.”

That rant didn’t come from some storefront Mullah or Bin Laden clutching his assault rifle in a cave on an Al Jazeera video. It came from the twisted mind of a sick and evil appeasement administration.

Sick and evil might have been a better description of Mohammed’s practice of sex slavery than of a young woman who drew a cartoon of a rapist as a pig. When the Caliph of the Islamic State was revealed to have taken American hostage Kayla Mueller as his slave, he was following the law of Mohammed.

As ISIS put it, "Enslaving the families of the kuffar (non-Muslims) and taking their women as concubines is a firmly established aspect of the Shariah (Islamic law) that if one were to deny or mock, he would be denying or mocking the verses of the Koran and the narrations of the Prophet.”

Was Mohammed a pig? He raped a little girl, forced his son to divorce his slave wife so he could have her, and took a number of captured non-Muslim women as slaves the same way the ISIS Caliph did. Their numbers included a number of captured Jewish women, Safiyah and Rayhana, as well as Arab women such as Juwayriyah. Rape and sexual slavery was a way of life for Mohammed and his men.

By any civilized standard, Mohammed was a pig and worse. And yet instead of calling out those who praise a rapist and a pedophile, we lock up the young women who dare call out his piggishness.

There is no reason to be surprised that these piggish habits should also be a way of life for his followers.

As we consider the fate of Kayla Mueller or of the thousands of girls groomed to be sex slaves to Muslim men in the UK, we must conclude that what happened to them took place because our societies have failed to tell the truth about Mohammed.

The response to Muslim violence has been greater extremes of censorship. There is a direct connection between the amount of protective censorship imposed on any criticism of Islam and Islamic violence. The Clinton administration rant about Tatiana’s cartoon took place after the World Trade Center bombing. And yet it would have been unthinkable then to lock up a Mohammed filmmaker, as Hillary and Obama did after the Benghazi massacre. Each new atrocity creates new momentum for censorship.

The Israeli police behave the way they do because the authorities are desperate to keep some kind of peace and it is always easier to censor, arrest and control non-Muslims than Muslims. That is also why the authorities in European countries are far more willing to lock up those who burn the Koran or criticize Islam than the Salafis who patrol the streets as Sharia police and call for a Caliphate.

This is not tolerance. It’s appeasement. It’s cowardice and treason.

We are in a race between collapsing systems struggling to prop up an impossible situation despite the outbursts of violence and those who tell the truth about them. The worse the situation becomes, the more the systems will try to retain control through censorship. Unable to control the followers of Mohammed, they will instead seek to control those who tell the truth about him.

Telling the truth will become more dangerous, but it will also save lives.

If Kayla Mueller had known the truth about Mohammed, she might never have gone to Syria. If more mothers and fathers in the UK had known the truth about Mohammed, they might have been better able to protect their daughters. If more people in America and Europe knew about Mohammed, they might demand that their governments let fewer migrants in who believe Mohammed is a role model.

What is happening in the Islamic State is only a more open version of what is already taking place in the West. Slavery has returned to America, not under the Confederate flag, but under the Saudi flag. The Muslim sex grooming in the UK does not come with its own flag, but with the Koran. And Muslims in this country continue to try and bring non-Muslim women out of this country to serve ISIS.

The Yazidi little girls enslaved by ISIS, just as little girls in the UK were enslaved by Muslim migrants, were told by their captors that raping them was a prayer to Allah.

“According to Islam he is allowed to rape an unbeliever,” a twelve-year-old girl was told. “He said that by raping me, he is drawing closer to Allah.”

As Islam spreads across the West, we are all drawing closer to Allah. Portions of cities go dark and become no-go zones. Terrible things happen there that no one talks about. It’s important to talk about them. But it’s also important to talk about what ties together the little girls in the Islamic State and the United Kingdom, the slave trade of over a thousand years and Mohammed’s wives.

And that is Mohammed. Mohammed was a pig. We can and should say it. As many times as it takes. He is not a role model. He is not a prophet. It’s not the women who call him a pig who are sick and evil.

It’s those who imitate and defend his sick and evil ways.

Telling the truth about Mohammed is more than a statement. It’s not a mere provocation. It saves lives.

(This article originally appeared in another form at Front Page Magazine)


Y. Ben-David said...

Some years ago the Muslim lobby in Britain tried to get Parliament to pass legislation prohibiting criticism of Islam. They were told that they can't propose a law that only benefits their religion. They then asked that a law be passed prohibiting criticism of ANY religion, but then they demanded an exception for Islam, which blasts Judaism and Christianity in the name of "freedom of religion"

Another item from Britain a couple of years ago had a television news program reveal that in Muslim schools children are taught Quranic attacks on Jews and Christians. The Muslim apologists used the old "context" excuse...i.e perish the thought that these Quranic statements have anything to do with modern Jews and Muslims, it is only referring to certain Jews and Christians with whom Muhammed had a problem. This then leads to the question that if indeed these bigoted statements have nothing to do with Islam today, why are they being taught in school at all?

A final piece also from Britain is that the BBC interviewed various HAMAS people in Gaza about their usual complaints about Israel. The BBC editors told them to translate all the curses against "Jews" as being against "Israelis" instead. More politically correct.

Keep up the good work, Daniel.

Anonymous said...

Dr. Martin Luther King saw through the contrived antisemitic cover word zionist decades ago. He knew it was code word for Jew and nothing more than disguised antisemitism.
Thank you for another depressingly truthful article Mr. Greenfield. I'm sure in the ugly world of today your written truths are merely written off as islamophobia (another disgusting neologism) both in the enemedia and the District of Corruptistan.

Anonymous said...

Well if they take over and succeed in crushing their opponents they'll have to put up or shut up about Is1am being a good system of government. It'll probably look like a Mad Max scenario. Everyone fighting everyone else as uncivilized as themselves over every perceived slight.

Will God wait until they die for judgement - or will the planet get a clean sweep of the flame mop.

GeirSmith said...

Daniel, Islam's the worst thing existing in the world.
Can you please read my articles at Beforeitsnew: King of Shambhala.
I'm Tibetan Tantric Buddhist the highest form of cutlure in the world. I oppose Obama's rampant Islamism. I'm supporting trump for his bringing up Obmaa's birth issue. I'm partof a select few worldiwe who wan to bring to the media's attention that the lottery in Obama's hometown drew the Mark of the Beast of 666 on the day after Obama's election and we call it a miraculous sign that Obama is the actual Biblical Antichrist. (And don't say I'm a Bible-Thumper if you thought so.)

Obama's deal with Iran is bringing nuclear holocaust to the whole world East to West. He fits the description of the Antichrist to the HILT. It's time to call him out. But only the heavenly power of that 666 curse can bring him to heel. "Cut Obama loose" is my motto. Don't support him by our silence.

112 said...

The supreme court in Israel converts the girls to islam and then keeps hero groups from bringing the kids back for the few that escape, because they converted the girl to pisslam and consider the children to be mudrats, not Jews. The supreme court of Israel are pigs, muslims are the way they are so that they destroy themselves, and evil people pretending to be nice. They are serving their purpose.

Rita said...

Anonymous said...

Daniel, I keep posting your articles on my Facebook page and telling people that at some point they need to start reading you. I appreciate your succinct and erudite way of teaching us the truth about the world as you see it.

AnechoicRoom said...

Far too nice/generous ... your Sultancy, Sir.

Moe, Ham, and Ed, weren't pigs, no.

They were steaming piles of pigsh*t.

Anonymous said...

It’s not the women who call him a pig who are sick and evil.

It’s those who imitate and defend his sick and evil ways.

As much culpability as is carried by those who imitate and defend his sick and evil ways, our greatest enemies are the non-muslims who erect P.C. smokescreens for those who imitate and defend his sick and evil ways. Silence them, and the problem goes away.

Anonymous said...

Mohammed was a pig, thus showing allah to be a pig farmer.

--theBuckWheat enjoys his right to post anonymously.

Anonymous said...

Pig excrement is more like it. If you have ever passed a pig farm on an August will know what I mean.

The best metaphor for Islam/Mohammedanism and its centuries-long record of murderous atrocities, wars, rapes and other human rights violations, is a vile, repugnant odor - such as - pig excrement - a rotting carcass - and those odious synthetic perfumes that you can't wash off.

Sibyl S.

Godfrey Daniels said...

Mohammed was a pig. Yes. Of course. And his followers like Obama are pigs. Who said we must be subservient to pigs? Is this some ritual of self-abnegation, a death wish by leftists, an idea to take seriously except to kill it?

mindRider said...

...and a few Israeli kids(4), who individually came to that same conclusion based on the behaviour of local muslims and voiced it publicly got arrested and charged by their government.

RAM said...

All the oppressors and wannabes see truth as the enemy. Any outbreak of truth threatens them all.

Anonymous said...

For these najjis kaffir who dare criticise moe-ham-head in Israel, do the authorities actually go through w/their persecution of these people for daring to criticise the holy psychopath of izlam? Would any Israeli jury actually find these people guilty?

Peter J said...

Well said Daniel

Just a common 'tater said...

Well Daniel, now you have added a new dimension to your unveiling of the twisted logic and the voluntary blindness of our collective Western "leadership." Unfortunately, this same mental impairment seems to have infected most of the Westernized countries from the top down.

Three Yanks and a Brit just prevented a massacre in France. France wrings their hands that although the terrorist was "on their radar" they were not able to do anything. So, somehow the terrorist got a small arsenal and this just slipped by Inspector Clouseau? He has had multiple run ins with the law and he was not sent packing? Sounds like San Fransicko. Oh, wait, they both welcome all the oppressed victims of the world, and especially offer sanctuary from the nasty evil police and La Migra. We collectively vote in the mentally and morally impaired leaders that roll over and play dead for these professional victims while these so called victims attack us. Is there really that much OPEC oil money being passed around?

I have no clue as to what it will take to awaken our collective brains and courage. It seems that between fantasy sports, Kardashian body parts, and DWTS, we are too mesmerized to act in a manner that will stave off disaster.

America and Western Europe you need to awaken. Katrina is on her way at CAT 5 and Nagin is not sending a bus out to take you out of harm's way.

The only way this will change is when some big politician's family is on the receiving end of Moe's version of peace and love to all. By then it will be too late.

Anonymous said...

No questions about the portrayal of the character the Muslim sources call Muhammad. And since all Muslims, and virtually all non-Muslims too, hitherto take Muhammad's historicity for granted, with the Muslims in addition considering him a role model, it is certainly vitally important to spread the word about how he is being portrayed in the Muslim literature itself.

But Muhammad criticism also as another layer, namely questioning his historicity. Was there even such an individual? That's by no means to be taken for granted, modern scholarship has come up with very serious arguments to doubt that. Even the entire traditional account of the genesis of Islam has been called into question.

For starters, just consider that all the authoritative Arabic sources at our disposal at the earliest date from 150 years after the events they purportedly describe, and most are considerably (plus / minus 100 years) younger still. To get an idea about their potential (un)reliability, for comparison now imagine that the first comprehensive history of WWI had not yet been written, that we would have to wait another fifty years for it, and that there were no proper archives and hardly any documents, but lots of oral traditions and interested parties. Then try to imagine the historical reliability of, say, the first French WWI account appearing around 2060.

Judith Koren has written a fine book assembling all the evidence for the evolving counter narrative. Unfortunately I can't thing of the exact title right now.

Artfldgr said...

But Piss Christ is not bad art?
and the virgin mary adorned with elephant dung is a goodness?
got it... thanks

Michael Gersh said...

Hmmm - more anonymous comments on this post than others. I laugh out loud. People who are willing to agree with you in secret are part of the reason Islam is winning, for now, this war. People need to proudly stand up and be counted. Be not afraid. In 2002 I had a fatwah pronounced on me for my blog postings on Islam after 9/11. I published my address. Those cowardly subhuman pig-people who call themselves Muslim never came to call. But at least they sign their work.

Kudos to you Dan, and shame on all the people who pretend to agree with you but grant victory to the pig-people by refusing to be named, too weak and fearful to stand up.

tony greene said...

I also have been hit by hard times. Me and my son are finally in a small apartment.

Post a Comment