Articles

Friday, June 19, 2015

The Myth of Muslim Radicalization

After some of its quarter of a million Muslims headed to join ISIS, Quebec decided the answer was a $2 million anti-radicalization center headed by a specialist in cultural sensitivity. But if you’re about to be beheaded by a masked ISIS Jihadist, a specialist in cultural sensitivity isn’t going to help you much.

Western governments nevertheless keep rolling out their culturally sensitive approaches to fighting ISIS.

The key element in Obama’s strategy for fighting ISIS isn’t the F-15E Strike Eagle, it’s a Twitter account run by a Muslim Brotherhood sympathizer which claims to “Counter Violent Extremism” by presenting moderate Islamists like Al Qaeda as positive role models for the Islamic State’s social media supporters.

So far 75% of planes flown on combat missions against ISIS return without engaging the enemy, but the culturally sensitive State Department Twitter account has racked up over 5,000 tweets and zero kills.

Cultural sensitivity hasn’t exactly set Iraq on fire in fighting ISIS and deradicalization programs here start from the false premise that there is a wide gap between a moderate and extremist Islam. Smiling news anchors daily recite new stories about a teenager from Kentucky, Boston or Manchester getting “radicalized” and joining ISIS to the bafflement of his parents, mosque and community.

And who is to blame for all this mysterious radicalization? It’s not the parents. It certainly can’t be the moderate local mosque with its stock of Jihadist CDs and DVDs being dispensed from under the table.

The attorney for the family of Usaama Rahim, the Muslim terrorist who plotted to behead Pamela Geller, claims that his radicalization came as a “complete shock” to them.

It must have come as a truly great shock to his brother Imam Ibrahim Rahim who claimed that his brother was shot in the back and that the Garland cartoon attack had been staged by the government.

It must have come as an even bigger shock to Imam Abdullah Faaruuq, the Imam linked to Usaama Rahim and his fellow terrorist conspirators, as well as the Tsarnaev brothers, who had urged Muslims to “grab onto the gun and the sword.” The culturally insensitive truth about Islamic ‘radicalization’ is that it is incremental.

There is no peaceful Islam. Instead of two sharply divided groups, peaceful Islam and extremist Islam, there is a spectrum of acceptable terrorism.

Muslim institutions have different places on that spectrum depending on their allegiances and tactics, but the process of radicalization is rarely a sharp break from the past for any except converts to Islam.

The latest tragic victim of radicalization is Munther Omar Saleh; a Muslim man living in New York City who allegedly plotted to use a Tsarnaev-style pressure cooker bomb in a major landmark such as the Statue of Liberty or the Empire State Building. Saleh claimed to be following orders from ISIS.

Media coverage of the Saleh arrest drags out the old clichés about how unexpected this sudden radicalization was, but what appears to be his father’s social media account shows support for Hamas.

Likewise one of Usaama Rahim’s fellow mosque attendees said that Rahim and another conspirator had initially followed the “teachings of the Muslim Brotherhood” but that he had been forced to cut ties with them when they moved past the Brotherhood and became “extreme”.

Despite the media’s insistence on describing the Muslim Brotherhood as a moderate organization, it has multiple terrorist arms, including Hamas, and its views on non-Muslims run the gamut from the violent to the genocidal.

A year after Obama’s Cairo speech and his outreach to the Muslim Brotherhood, its Supreme Guide announced that the United States will soon be destroyed, urged violent terrorist attacks against the United States and “raising a jihadi generation that pursues death just as the enemies pursue life.”

Despite this, Obama continued backing the Muslim Brotherhood’s rise to power across the region.

There are distinctions between the Muslim Brotherhood and Al Qaeda, but the latter is a splinter group of the former. Al Qaeda’s current leader came out of the Muslim Brotherhood. A move from one to the other is a minor transition between two groups that have far more in common than their differences.

And since the Brotherhood controls much of the Islamic infrastructure in the United States, the idea that Munther Omar Saleh or Usaama Rahim became radicalized because they went from a Jihadist group that takes the long view in the struggle against the infidel, putting political structures into place to make a violent struggle tactically feasible, to a Jihadist group that focuses more on short term violence, is silly.

Radicalization isn’t transformational; it’s incremental.

It’s the Pakistani kid down the block deciding that instead of joining the Muslim Students Association and then CAIR to build Islamist political structures in America, he should just cut to the chase and kill a few cops to begin taking over America now. Radicalization is the moderate Imam who stops putting on an act for PBS and the local politicians and moves to Yemen where he openly recruits terrorists to attack America instead of doing it covertly at his mosque in Virginia.

Radicalization is the teenage Muslim girl who forgets about marrying her Egyptian third cousin and bringing him and his fifty relatives to America and goes to join ISIS as a Caliphate brood mare instead.

It’s not pacifism giving way to violence. Instead it’s an impatient shift from tactical actions meant to eventually make Islam supreme in America over many generations to immediate bloody gratification. ISIS is promising the apocalypse now. No more waiting. No more lying. You can have it tomorrow.

Radicalization does not go from zero to sixty. It speeds up from sixty to seventy-five.

It builds on elements that are already there in the mosque and the household. The term “extremism” implicitly admits that what we are talking about is not a complete transformation, but the logical extension of existing Islamic beliefs.

Omar Saleh seemed cheerful enough about Hamas dropping Kassam rockets on Israeli towns and cities. Would he have supported his son setting off a bomb in the Statue of Liberty? Who knows, but his son was already starting from a family position that Muslim terrorism against non-Muslims was acceptable.

Everything else is the fine print.

When Usaama Rahim followed the way of the Muslim Brotherhood, he was with a moderate group whose spiritual guide, the genocidal Qaradawi was the godfather of cartoon outrage and had endorsed the murderous Iranian fatwa against Salman Rushdie.

The slope that leads from Qaradawi’s cartoon rage to trying to behead Pamela Geller isn’t a slippery one; it’s a vertical waterfall. And this is what radicalization really looks like. It doesn’t mean moderates turning extreme. It means extremists becoming more extreme. And there’s always room for extremists to become more extreme which turns old extremists into moderates while mainstreaming their beliefs.

In the UK, Baroness Warsi, Cameron’s biggest mistake, blamed Muslim radicalization on the government’s refusal to engage with… radicals. Or as she put it, “It is incredibly odd and incredibly worrying that over time more and more individuals, more and more organisations are considered by the government to be beyond the pale and therefore not to be engaged with.”

The reason why the government is refusing to “engage” with these organizations is that they support terrorism in one form or another. Warsi is proposing that the UK fight radicalization by mainstreaming it.

Mainstreaming extremism is also Obama’s policy. It’s the logic behind nearly every Western diplomatic move in the Middle East from the Israel-PLO peace process to the Brotherhood’s Arab Spring. And these disasters only created more Islamic terrorism.

The Muslim teenagers headed to join ISIS did not come out of a vacuum. They came from mosques and families that normalized some degree of Islamic Supremacism and viewed some Muslim terrorists as heroes and role models. It’s time for Western governments to admit that the ISIS Jihadist is more the product of his parents and his teachers than of social media Jihadis on YouTube and Twitter.

Radicalization doesn’t begin with a sheikh on social media. It begins at home. It begins in the mosque. It just ends with ISIS.

11 comments:

Keli Ata said...

Wonderful article, once again. One sentence stands out and it is a critical one:

"Radicalization isn’t transformational; it’s incremental."

aggiemom said...

The distinction in the media between "Islam" and "Islamism" has always seemed like a false distinction to me, as you explain here. From what I know about Islam, the "radicalized, Islamist" Muslims are the ones who take the violent teachings of Islam seriously and are willing to act on them and the "moderates" are the ones who, as you said, are more incremental in their approach to advancing Islam.

D.D. Edwards said...

Once again you nail it Daniel. I have been preaching this for some years myself, however not stated quite as eloquently. Even the conservative talking heads don't quit grasp this.

DenisO said...

"Radicalization doesn’t begin with a sheikh on social media. It begins at home. It begins in the mosque. It just ends with ISIS."
It comes from the mosques that convince the fathers that violence against infidels is "holy". It is RELIGION that causes violence, and history is witness to it in almost all cases, because religion being irrational, primitive, and emotional, is extremely powerful. If you are a BELIEVE, where do you stop believing? If such a power can be controlled, almost any goal can be achievable. Like Hitler, one man can make people do inhuman things. Who and why?
The most logical reasons that could provoke the hate have to be either the 1400 year hatred between Muslim sects, or the Oil wealth of the Sunni kingdoms. It's possible that both could be drivers of the pathology.
Muhammad Sixpack could really care less about infidels or idealism. He's driven by hormones, inflamed by his religion's prohibitions. Like almost all wars, he is told that god wants him to be a holy warrior, and his father approves (and there's the 32 or more virgins).. He is doing his holy duty to god, as learned and ingrained on men in the mosques. It worked for the "Prophet", and it still works.
The middle enemy officers are the Imams who lead the infantry of unthinking Muslim youth. It would be very easy to prove the enemy Officer corp are in the mosques, and they have to be named and targeted as enemies. They operate without fear in their Mosques; that has to change.
The violence will be seen mainly in the cities controlled by the Left, as with all the other destruction their policies cause. Elections have consequences, as they say.
Regards,

Anonymous said...

DP111 adds

Radicalization doesn’t begin with a sheikh on social media. It begins at home. It begins in the mosque, and its roots are in the Koran and Hadiths. ISIS and their likes, are merely the foot soldiers.



Ignatius Acton Chesterton OCD said...

The Millier Analogies Test needs a new problem:

Islam : Peace :: Hillary Rodham Clinton : Indivudual Accomplishment

fsy said...

By now, the point has been made here and elsewhere countless thousands of times: The West, the only domain of any freedom on earth, has fallen under the control of a crew of people who are either idiots or traitors or both. To take only the most obvious and worst example, Obama certainly is aware that Islam is a belief system which is incompatible with the ideals of liberty upon which the United States of America was founded. And he sides with Islam.

The only question is, "What can be done?". To that, I have no practical answer, but I'm sure there are people who do have at least some suggestions.

The Confederate flag has been in the news recently as the Left tries to take advantage of the actions of a genuinely mad racist in South Carolina. Whatever one thinks of the views of the South in the Civil War, it seems to me that the idea of decentralization, states' rights, and even secession may be worth putting on the list of possible reactions to the treason which has been going on for at least the past six years.

Anonymous said...

http://i.imgur.com/72wx0MU.jpg Starting a new life in Canada contact ISIS

Anonymous said...

How true, also in the light of latest contributions to world peace by members of The Religion of Peace in the Somalian savanne, on the Sousse's beach, in the houses of Kobani and in the Shiite mosque of Kuwait City.

Clelia&Eric, Eurabia, Italian province

Anonymous said...

Living in Quebec, I can tell you that any efforts on the part of a cuturally sensetive entity to have any success against 'radicalization' is aking to trying to put out an oil refinery fire with a garden hose. Minorities in Quebec are generally segregated and muslim enclaves already exist. The mosque where Ahmed Ressam was recruited is walking distance from my house and on Friday nights after their prayers the place looks like downtown Kabul. Living among them, I have been able to gain insight into their mindset. Form what I have experienced, I can assure you, thay have no intention to assimilate or 'moderate' theiur views regarding islam's ultimate goals. Socialists here in Quebec, and their sensitivity agancies, are clueless with regard to the nature of islam, as they are throughout North America and Europe. Their stupidity and arrogance will be the end of us all.

Anonymous said...

Yes, and:

"Radicalization does not go from zero to sixty. It speeds up from sixty to seventy-five."

tells us how far it has been incremented!

Post a Comment