Monday, January 19, 2015

Suppose Islam Had a Holocaust and No One Noticed

While Western newspapers were debating whether or not to reprint the Mohammed cartoons, in Nigeria as many as 2,000 people were massacred by the Islamic State in Nigeria, also known as Boko Haram, in what is being called the deadliest attack by the Muslim group to date.

Survivors described the Islamic State setting up efficient killing teams and massacring everyone
while shouting “Allahu Akbar”. "For five kilometers (three miles), I kept stepping on dead bodies until I reached Malam Karanti village, which was also deserted and burnt," one survivor said.

There’s a word for that. It’s genocide.

The Islamic State in Nigeria had reportedly managed to kill 2,000 people last year. This year they did it in one week. But we don’t pay much attention to what happens in Nigeria unless there’s a hashtag. No one has yet thought up a clever hashtag for the murder of 2,000 people. #Bringbackourdead doesn’t really work.

The Islamic State’s next target is Maiduguri, the largest city in Borno with a population of over a million. Known as the “Home of Peace”, if Maiduguri falls, the death toll will be horrific.

The Catholic Archbishop, Ignatius Kaigama, warned that the killing wouldn’t stop in Nigeria. “It's going to expand. It will get to Europe and elsewhere.”

Of course it already has, but not on the same scale.

“We will conquer Europe one day. It is not a question of (if) we will conquer Europe, just a matter of when that will happen,” an Islamic State spokesman had warned. “The Europeans need to know that when we come, it will not be in a nice way. It will be with our weapons.”

“Those who do not convert to Islam or pay the Islamic tax will be killed.”

Imagine that the burning towns and villages aren’t in Nigeria or Syria. Imagine them in France or Sweden. It’s not that great of a leap from armed cells carrying out attacks to a militia capturing entire towns and villages. They’re different phases in the same conflict.

Al Qaeda in Iraq went from a terror group carrying out suicide bombings to running a state in a decade. So did Hamas in Israel. There are already zones in Europe under the control of unofficial Sharia police. France has fewer Muslims than Nigeria and a more stable government with professional police and military forces. These two factors are the only ones keeping Islamic genocide at bay.

The massacres in France were carried out by the same types of men and movements responsible for the killings in Nigeria and Iraq. They just aren’t organized enough and still lack the numbers to conduct the same large scale genocide that they are already carrying out in Nigeria, Syria and Iraq.

Two Islamic States, one in Nigeria and another in Iraq/Syria, are engaged in genocide. Obama delayed responding to ISIS until it was already engaged in genocide and was moving on Baghdad. His people have done everything possible to avoid responding to the Boko Haram genocide in Nigeria.

The usual excuses are there. The central governments are compromised, incompetent and corrupt. The only possible solution is political. The real issue is poverty. Meanwhile the killing and the denial go on.

The foreign policy infrastructure, the human rights NGOs and the self-important scribblers who presume to tell the world what is important in the pages of the New York Times and the Washington Post have fought hard to avoid connecting the killings by the Islamic State in Nigeria to the killings by the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria. And they have fought hardest of all to avoid connecting these killings to the thousands murdered in the streets of New York and the latest bodies strewn about Paris. The killings can be connected with three simple words; global Islamic genocide.

The European intellectuals of the last century were too fixated on their vision of a better world to understand what was happening in Germany and Japan. And what had to be done about it. While they dreamed of a world government that would do away with war, the killing had already begun.

The intellectuals of this century are equally unwilling to take their attention away from microfinance, climate change and world government to see the beginnings of a worldwide Holocaust underway.

Genocide isn’t new to Africa or the Middle East so they put it down to local tribal conflicts. Terrorism isn’t new to America or Europe, so they blame political extremism. Like the elephant and the blind men who touched its trunk and thought it was a snake, they respond to the local manifestation of Islamic genocide by seeing a familiar local phenomenon; tribal war, political extremism or minority problems.

And anyone who sees the big picture is instantly denounced as an Islamophobe. But what if the Muslim genocide of Hindus and Buddhists in Asia and the Muslim genocide of Christians and Jews in the Middle East are part of the same phenomenon?

What if the Islamic State killers in Nigeria who shout “Allahu Akbar” during their massacres share a motive with the 9/11 hijackers who were told to “shout 'Allahu Akbar,' because this strikes fear in the hearts of the non-believers”?

What if a common bloody thread of Koran verses runs through the massacres of non-Muslims in the Philippines and Kenya, in Israel and Australia, in France and China, in Thailand and Syria?

What if the acts of terror on the evening news are not random events, workplace violence, mental illness and political extremism, but the beginning of another global Islamic genocide?

The rise of Islam was not based on faith, but on mass murder.

Within a few centuries of the time that Mohammed had ordered the ethnic cleansing of Jews and Christians from the Arabian Peninsula, the massacre of millions of Christians, Jews, Hindus and Buddhists was underway across the Middle East through India and as far as Afghanistan.

The Islamic Holocaust was the greatest act of mass murder in human history. And it is still taking place today over a thousand years later.

The decay of the Roman Empire created an opening for the Islamic conquests. As Western civilization, which plays much the same role as the Roman Empire did in tying parts of the world together, falls, a new wave of Islamic conquest and genocide is underway.

"Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it," George Santayana wrote.

It would be a terrible thing indeed if we were condemned to repeat the mass murder of hundreds of millions and the eradication of entire civilizations under the black flag of the Jihad because we refused to remember the past or acknowledge the present. Because we were too afraid of being called Islamophobic to speak out for the dead around the world.

It would be a terrible thing if the Nigerian village of today were to become a Swedish village tomorrow. It would be an even worse thing if the Muslim conquests of India were to be repeated in Europe.

Genocide is an ugly word.

It’s a word that we have come to associate with villages in Africa or with old concentration camps in Europe. We don’t think of it as something that can happen to us or to our children.

But we should.

The Islamic wars from Nigeria to Israel, from Iraq to Kashmir, are genocidal. Israel may become the first Western country to suffer Islamic genocide, but it will not be the last. 9/11 was the first Islamic mass murder of thousands of Americans, but it will not be the last.

In the face of genocide, our first duty is to warn the world.

The Counterjihad is a war for our survival. It is our resistance to global Islamic genocide.


Anonymous said...

It wasn't that long ago that there was going to be zero tolerance for genocide. We weren't going to ask why. We were all going to denounce it when we saw it.

It wasn't that long ago that the liberal Jewish community was in a lather about Kosovo. Genocide there simply couldn't be permitted. We would stop it first and ask for a political solution later. Bombing was fine. Military action needed. We would not stay still!

The same urgency is no longer found. Now we have to understand it all. It went from Never Again to Never Jump to Conclusions. I wonder if the stances were due to the needs of their political masters. Actually I don't. I know it was.

RAM said...

Clearly, some outsiders are terrorizing the world in order to discredit the Religion of Peace.

mindRider said...

Apparently Obama is stopping Samantha Power from now applying the Obligation To Protect law concerning the present Nigerian massacre committed by Muslims, while at one time she was so eager to activate it against Israel when that country was fighting Hamas in self-defense.

Danya Suliman said...

Muslims are being massacred by these terrorists wayyyy before they terrorized on 9/11

Anonymous said...

This article is a pretense of cleverness but cloaked in prejudice.To the author:
There is no argument from me on the the lack of intervention regarding Muslim extremists, however it is ridiculous to claim the islamic faith has set the record for genocide. European countries have won they battle hands down. Let's see between colonization, slavery, missionaries/Catholic church, and more, Europe wins by a landslide. It always amazes me how easily Europeans forget their contributions to the instability that is currently playing out. It was European colonization and the post world war 2 land grab that created much of this tension. It was euro centricity and it's history of prejudice against all things non white and/or Christian that has helped to create a deep resentment in others. This article further perpetuates that euro centric mindset. It's unfortunate and terrorism is unacceptable however the idea that it must be stopped not for the sake of all but because it may soon be in Europe or america is terrible. Side note/quick history lesson Muhammed never ordered an ethnic cleansing. In fact islam spread so quickly because it was so tolerant. Do a little research before printing. And before you play the I'm an islamic sympathizer or Muslim, I'm ex military and Catholic. I'm also well educated, studying economics and political science at an ivy league institution. I am no subject matter expert but have at least book and real life experience to support my claims. People like you just add to problem rather than the solution. You are prejudiced and attempting to mask your fear with good intentions. But when declare that islamic terror is bad in Africa but worse if it happens in Europe your agenda becomes transparent. You need to take a long look in the mirror.

Anonymous said...

And when, not if, they get nuclear weapons, just what country do we bomb in retaliation when they wipe out an American city?

Pray to God I'm wrong......

Anonymous said...

This article is one opinion and factually inaccurate.

Anonymous said...

We should fight back now i know i wood fight for my freedom till the death sow lets not let it get to that they have no respect for life sow why should we give them respect animals thats all they are

Ignatius Acton Chesterton OCD said...

Peace is the absence of war. As long as war is unseen, of course.

Just a common 'tater said...

Your points are so clear and articulate. However, the people reading your column are most likely aware of the not so new, ongoing holocaust. The problem with doing something about this are multiple. The governments involved are inept, incompetent, and corrupt. Including ours. The Benghazi and IRS scandals are good examples, as well as the bumbling wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. The burning villages are already occurring in the no go enclaves in France, Italy, and Sweden. The MSM, Hollywood celebrities, and politicians all assure us, this is not Islam. The response from so-called moderates is remarkable for its absence.

I had no idea that we had so many theologians and scholars that have studied Islamic history, culture, and theology. In Arabic no less, I presume. Actually it is probably OPEC oil money buying vetoes for keystone (along with some railroad stock), OPEC princes with stock portfolios that include MSM holdings, and just plain stupidity/gullibility/attention seeking by pseudo-intellectual hacks that perpetuate this cover up.

But, it is all there to be seen by everyone. However, just as in the lead up to WWII, people see what they want, believe what they want, and do what they want. Facts not withstanding. In other words, here we go again, but this time, where are the allies that are willing and able to fight?

Doris Wise Montrose said...

Was the United Nations ever able to define genocide? B/c the claim was that they were not able to do anything unless it was genocide and they first had to define genocide. Just wondering if enough people have been slaughtered yet to have an actual definition.

Rabelad said...

"And anyone who sees the big picture is instantly denounced as an Islamophobe."

Those who accuse us of being "Islamophobic" are denying the truth. I have a tactic that I use against others in argumentation and debate where I use their own logic against them. I turn the tables on them with their own logic and principles. I applied this against one who claimed that I'm Islamophobic, and said that he is phobic regarding the TRUTH. Truthophobia? Well, that's what it is, but truthophobia doesn't sound official and so doesn't have much impact. (As if "Islamophobia" is an official psychological disorder!) But whaddya know, I just looked it up on the net and it turns out that there is an official psychological disorder which afflicts people who are quite literally phobic when hearing or speaking the truth. The label for this is alethophobia (n.)and is an abnormal fear of the truth. It's time we call a spade a spade: they are phobic of the stark and obvious truth that Islam is out to make us submit. Alethophobia is a ramapant psychological disorder in the west and it's about time we throw this fact into their faces. If they can call us "Islamophobic" then we should fight back in kind and call them "alethophobic".

Anonymous said...

Great contribution by Rabelad


(plural alethophobias)

A crippling fear of truth.
The inability to accept unflattering facts about your nation, religion, culture, ethnic group, or yourself

The word for Islam and its apologists was there all along.

Anonymous said...

If you haven't read or re-read Wretchard's, "The Three Conjectures" you should. It is Muslims, not non-Muslims, who will pay the ultimate price.

mark abrams said...

"I'm also well educated, studying economics and political science at an ivy league institution." which explains why you parrot lefty nonsense without a lick of truth in it. You havent read either the koran or the bible and your so-called history is ridiculous. Everything is the fault of the west and christianity, and yet that is the only civilization which has brought wealth and longer life to billions. Why not walk your talk and go live in a muslim paradise, get your health care and dental work there too. Go play a concert for the villagers in Syria, then we can watch youtube as your instruments are smashed and you are defenestrated.

joan said...

Anonymous, your "Ivy League" education explains everything about your post.

Anonymous said...

No. Don't just count the last century, go back to the start of Islam. Take a look at Indian sub-continent, Persia, large swaths of Africa and Europe. I think you're suffering from more than a little bias yourself.

Allen Cogbill said...

I find it interesting that the loathsome Samantha Powers, who claims to adhere to a strict anti-genocide position, and who has advocated the invasion of Israel by U.S. forces in order to "halt the genocide in the West Bank and Gaza", has, to my knowledge, said absolutely nothing about the slaughter in Nigeria.

Allen Cogbill said...

Well, what country will it be? Inquiring minds wish to know...

I certainly do not know. Saudi Arabians attacked the U.S. on 09/11/2001, but we certainly did not eradicate Saudi Arabia.

Allen Cogbill said...

You are correct in that the Europeans committed a number of horrible genocides—one of the worst was the King of Belgium exterminating millions of people in the Belgian Congo. Perhaps the Euros were simply more efficient than the Muslims (I don't know). Certainly the Americans did much to exterminate the indigenous folks in North America, though it wasn't really because of race, but because they wanted to steal the land.

I am completely unpersuaded that Islam spread quickly because it was tolerant, unless by tolerant one means "you can keep your life if you swear allegiance to us and pay us tribute". I suppose it's better than simply getting killed, though, some might disagree on this point, however.

The difference here is that Europeans and Americans, among others, look at the Muslims as though most Muslims were actually in the 21st century and should behave as though they are in the 21st century. Unfortunately, it seems that (a) a large fraction of Muslims are stuck in a pre-19th century viewpoint, and (b) the Islamic "Reformation, which many westerners hope will come to pass, is actually happening under our eyes, and it seeks to "reform" Islam into its 7th-century roots.

Anonymous said...

Actually communism and its assorted forms wins hands down as they killed more in one century than everyone else combined. Islam has always been a religion of conquest so the authors point is a great one that you will soon see this in Europe unless it is countered. Islam would have already taken over Europe if they had not been stopped in France by Charles Martel.

MarkJ said...

The 13 young Muslim boys slaughtered by ISIS in Mosul the other day for watching a TV football match were not immediately available to respond to your idiotic posts.

Daniel Greenfield @ the Sultan Knish blog said...

They were slaughtered by Muslims under the mandate of an Islamic Caliphate under Islamic Law.

The USSR also killed plenty of Communists and Nazi Germany killed its own as well.

What's your point?

Anonymous said...

After 9/11 we should have exterminated them.

Anonymous said...


Anonymous said...

Yeah, I like how he's 'ex-military and Catholic" too! Snort! Perhaps he can tell us why the Sikh religion was founded if he's so educated...Universities today only indoctrinate students into the Leftist cults of loathing for Western Civilization, multiculturalism and demonizing whites. Remember when the Left ranted against the demonization of whole peoples, regarding it as a necessary first step towards genocide? To those who hate the color of their skin or their civilizational heritage, I hope I live long enough to see you get your comeuppance.

gemma said...


gemma said...

Thank you Mark J

Anonymous said...

Both Communism and Nazism had "force multipliers" in tanks, automatic weapons, grenades, a police state, media, etc. Yes, both murdered MILIIONS in the last century, and, by the numbers, communism murdered more, but "religion" as practiced by evil men are a close second in avoidable deaths.

Unknown said...

I believe the UN defines genocide as any defensive action undertaken by the Israeli government.....

Anonymous said...

Our intellectual elite teach us to have respect and tolerance for all cultures - why shouldn't we respect genocide or ritual beheadings if they constitute legitimate long-held cultural practices in non-Western communities?

Patrick said...

So, the bad guys get a freebie?

Patrick said...

If by "terrorists" you mean the various autocratic kleptocracies that constitute the Muslim world, I'm with you.

Anonymous said...

We stood idly by while Rwanda became a killing ground. We'll do the same here because the Nigerians are black and mainly Christians.

Too bad, but it is mindful of FDR and the Jews, Gypsies, others.

We should be ashamed, and we're not.

J.R. Ireland said...

"There is no argument from me on the the lack of intervention regarding Muslim extremists, however it is ridiculous to claim the islamic faith has set the record for genocide. European countries have won they battle hands down. Let's see between colonization, slavery, missionaries/Catholic church, and more, Europe wins by a landslide."

I always love arguments like this for a number of reasons. Let's pick your idiotic claim apart:

1. Colonization. You mean like Muslims conquering northern Africa? How about the Mughal conquest of India? The conquest by the Ottomans of Constantinople followed immediately by attacks into the heart of Europe, which culminated in the siege of Vienna?

Hell, several Mongol warlords (who were highly expansionist) converted to Islam, including Genghis Khan's grandson. Between all of that, Islam did some tremendous killing throughout the entire period you're discussing.

2. Slavery. You clearly don't know the history of either the Ottoman Empire or the Mamluk Empire. The Mamluk's were actual slave soldiers that eventually became so powerful they took over what had previously been the Ayyubid Empire. They reigned in Egypt after this conquest until the Ottomans conquered them, and the whole time the Mamluks replenished their military by taking children as slaves and raising them to be soldiers. The Ottoman's, meanwhile, had a corps of elite troops called Janissaries who were Christian children that were kidnapped, converted to Islam, and raised to be slave soldiers. The Ottomans also staffed their galleys with slaves and were involved in the African slave trade.

3. Missionaries/Catholic Church. You'll get no complaints from me if you call the Catholic Church horrible. However, you should probably look up some of the stuff that was done in the Middle East in the name of Allah before desperately trying to claim the Catholic Church was somehow original in its depravity.

Try to educate yourself in this subject before holding court next time, and I won't have to show up and embarrass you.

Anonymous said...

Who says that communism is not a religion? Except the communists, of course.

Anonymous said...

Hmmm...why do Democrats fail to act when genocide is occurring?

Islamic genocide now underway under Obama

Rwanda and the former Yugoslavia under Clinton

Cambodia under Carter

The Holocaust under FDR

Moishe3rd said...

There is a problem.
In the past, most wars were fought against a specific enemy.
Yes, the current Islamist iterations of Islam are Evil. Yes, it would be a blessing for them to be destroyed.
However, as we have already discovered with the Arabs called Palestinians who used to be called Jordanians or Egyptians or Syrians, that when they are destroyed and defeated and totally subjugated, another iteration - call it Hamas or Al Asqua or the PLO or the PA... It is born with hatred and death anew.
As we have discovered the same in Libya, after killed that evil dictator - new Islamist nutburgers have begun a whole new cycle of death.
Iraq - remove Saddam; get a corrupt Shia elected; get Islamic State of Terror.
Afghanistan - kill that one get this one.
Iran; Sudan; Algeria; Pakistan; the whole alphabet soup of Islamist murderers vying for power.... To Replace the previous Islamist murdering scum!
We kept on fighting proxy wars against "Communism" until the Soviet Union fell. Voila - the war against Communism ended. Communism ceased to be a threat.

In other words - we need to fight and eliminate the Source of the Islamist problem and that source is Saudi Arabia.
Change; Abrogate; Kill; or otherwise make the Wahhabist Saudi religion that has replaced normative Sunni Islam, null and void and the whole Islamist (Sunni) movement dies.
Cut off the head of the beast. It dies.
(Then we focus on the Shia death cult of Vilayat al Fiqh)

Anonymous said...

Yeah, all that slaughter that happened so long ago that nobody alive today ever met someone alive then really doesn't mean a thing to me.

Today, right now, the people who want to kill me, have declared that they want to and WILL kill me, are muslims. As a non-believer who thinks that their prophet is a misogynistic pedophile, their "holy" book demands I be killed (if for no other reason than I just insulted their prophet). I am amongst the billions of people that they have claimed to want to kill or enslave. As long as that is the case, I'm going to continue to advocate that we kill them before they succeed in killing us. Anyone who doesn't understand that muslims are working towards a stated goal is either an idiot who, for some reason, refuses to believe it when someone claims that they wish to kill infidels and then DOES it really means what they say, or is a willing enabler (and is on my "kill them first" list).

Anonymous said...

Since 9/11/2001, muslims have murdered on average 80+ non-muslims per day, primarily for the crime of not being muslim. See here for more:
In December, they killed about 2,500 for the month. A 9/11 every month for what is now over 13 years. They're well over 250,000 and closing in on 500,000.

Ray said...

It's too late to look up the specifics, but the gist is that the British were trying to end the practice of killing the wives of men who had died by throwing the women on the funeral pyres. It was argued by the Indians that this was a tradition of their culture. The governor replied that by all means they should abide by their culture and traditions, but that it was his culture's tradition to hang everyone involved with murdering a woman by burning her to death. The British prevailed.

autothreads said...

I think it's rich calling Sultan Knish, a Jew, "euro centric". Jews, at least if they know history, know too well the flaws of Europe. However, the sins and crimes of Europeans don't change the fact that Islam has been waging an imperial war of conquest for 14 centuries.

mindRider said...

A simple man's side thought: All who so bitterly condemn the white men from having massacred more than other colored men tend to forget that the white men's inventions, medical and economic, have saved more lives of any color during the last 50 years than where ever murdered. Side thought two: The black Americans, so bitterly and so daily complaining to white America about the horror of slavery fail to buy a one way ticket and return to Africa, much preferring to live under the"racist" USA. Side thought nr.three: Hardly any of the leftwing accommodators of Islam in the west would take a one way ticket (see nr.2) to live under sharia law in one of the countries they so admire......

Anonymous said...

Before this is over with, either they will kill a lot of us or we will kill a lot of them. We know what is coming if we don't act. I say we need to start now and not stop until the job is done.

Anonymous said...

Charles Napier - "Be it so. This burning of widows is your custom; prepare the funeral pile. But my nation has also a custom. When men burn women alive we hang them, and confiscate all their property. My carpenters shall therefore erect gibbets on which to hang all concerned when the widow is consumed. Let us all act according to national customs."

Anonymous said...

Evasion is the hallmark of our culture. I can think of 2 corny comedies that had vicious monster / aliens and the intellectual [scientist] who refused to see the threat, even while his own arms and head are being ripped from his body. I'm re-accessioning my opinion of them; they now seem prescient. djr

Anonymous said...

Islam has committed holocaust after holocaust for centuries. Islam is a continual atrocity, crime, bloodbath caused by the conflicted, unstable, dissonant negative mental state created in the mind of its followers by its contradictory, irreconcilable ideology. Islam promotes hate, war, slavery, oppression, lust, lies, inhumanity and death.

Sibyl S.

Anonymous said...

As pessimistic as I am about the future of Europe and the rise of Islam within it, Nigeria could not be played out on European soil. The fact is that the moment Islamists come at European society in any organised way - with a militia - it will be all over for them. In fact I would say that many civilian Europeans are counting on this to happen, because sadly this is the only thing which will force European governments to act to remove Islam.

As long as we have "lone wolf" attacks - even if they pick up in frequency from every fortnight to every day - the politicians and our media will make excuses about a "tiny minority". Once we are faced with an armed militia of 100s or even 1000s of Muslims attacking our towns that deceit will have to end.

Once we've dispensed with the Muslims, then hopefully we can move on to the traitorous politicians who allowed the situation to get this bad in the first place.

Yokel said...

Several commenters have noted how little the Left has done to oppose these various massacres/genocides; these killings of Christians & Jews. Perhaps there is a reason for that. We know that Marx hated Christians & Jews with a vengeance, as exemplified by his "observation" that "Religion is the opium of the masses". The Left has always been a good breeding ground for anti-Semitism.

Could it be that the Muslims get a free pass on so many things because what they are doing is useful to the Left who are the current ruling elite? Indeed could the Muslims have been "invited" to the West for that specific purpose?

If true, that poses an awkward question. What happens when the Left thinks that the Muslims have done what was required of them, but the Muslims observe that they do not yet have their world-wide caliphate? Interesting scrap a-coming!

Daniel Greenfield @ the Sultan Knish blog said...

Muslims were indeed embraced by the left elite because of their useful destructiveness.

Anonymous said...

The greatest joy in a Muslim's life is to die in the service of Allah. They WANT to die because their lives are one big mandatory suck fest; a suck fest by the way that they would kill you for suggesting they get out of. Thus, the only way to defeat Islam is to completely wipe it from the Earth. Turn all Mosques into pig farms and homosexual brothels. Burn the Koran, the Hadith(s), and every mention of More-Ham-Head (Pigs Be Upon Him) from the pages of history. This is not racist - as they are not a race, but a medieval conglomeration of dirt-worshiping savages that WILL NOT STOP until the world is Islamic, or all non muslims (Kafir) are dead. They are commanded by their pedophile prophet to LIE TO US about anything that will advance the Islamist agenda of worldwide enslavement. To you sexually repressed "Jihadhi Cool" pieces of crap: I've read your vile filth. I've combed through every inch of your so called "holy" books (knowing about abrogation and the fact that the Koran is not in chronological order helped) and found nothing but rape (tons of it including CHILD RAPE), incest, murder, mutilation, the very minute More-Ham-Head (Penis Be Upon Him) gained a little bit of political power. He was all Islam is Peace until he found enough dirt-worshiping cowards to join him in raping and pillaging.

Fuck Islam
Fuck Shari'ah Law
Fuck Jihad
Fuck Mohammed, y'all

Anonymous said...

Anonymous posts this: "Side note/quick history lesson Muhammed never ordered an ethnic cleansing. In fact islam spread so quickly because it was so tolerant."

Correction - straight from the Qur'an chapter 9 verse 29:
“Those who do not convert to Islam or pay the Islamic tax (JIZYAH) will be killed.”
Jizyah is protection racket money. Conquered non-Muslims are allowed to purchase their lives, which are otherwise forfeit to their Muslim conquerors, with money.Jizya is simply extortion money. Its purpose has always been to provide non-Muslims with protection from Muslims: pay up, or else become one of us and convert to Islam, or else die. This is commanded in both the Qur'an and aHadith (sayings of Muhammad), the twin pillars of Islam.

Traditionally the collection of the jizyah occurs at a ceremony that is designed to emphasize the subordinate status of the non-Muslim, where the subject is often struck in a humiliating fashion. M.A. Khan recounts that some Islamic clerics encouraged tax collectors to spit into the mouths of Hindu dhimmis during the process. He also quotes the popular Sufi teacher, Shaykh Ahmad Sirhindi:

"The honor of Islam lies in insulting the unbelief and the unbelievers (kafirs). One who respects kafirs dishonors Muslims... The real purpose of levying the Jizya on them is to humiliate them... [and] they remain terrified and trembling."

Also, Muhammad DID order ethnic cleansing of Arabia, as narrated by 'Umar b. al-Khattib (Book 019, Number 4366:) the Messenger of Allah said: “I will expel the Jews and Christians from the Arabian Peninsula and will not leave any but Muslim.”
During the ten years before he died, Muhammad waged war on Arabia and ethnically cleased Yathrib [which he renamed Madinah - meaning "The Din (Law) of Ah"] of its entire Jewish population. He exiled some clans, and beheaded the males and enslaved the women and children of other clans. His earliest biographer, Ibn Ishaq, records that Muhammad personally beheaded between 600 and 900 men of the Jewish Qurayzah clan of Yathrib.
“The men of the Qurayzah were slain; the women were sold as captives of war (booty); their lands and properties were distributed or divided among the Muhajirs (Muhammad's followers)". [Yousuf Ali’s tafsir for Sura Ahzab].

In his campaign of eradicating all the Jewish tribes of Arabia, Muhammad and his marauders attacked the Jewish villages of Khyabar, Arabia in 628 BCE. This was a preemptive surprise attack, a Gazzowa (a sudden and unprovoked assault). After beheading the males over 12 years of age, he selected some of the Jewish women as his own personal sex slaves while distributing the remainder among his loyal cutthroat followers.

The Islamic Prophet on his death-bed, gave three orders one of them was to Expel the pagans from the Arabian Peninsula. (Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 288)

Further, Muhammad ordered genocide of all Jews:
Narrated 'Abdullah bin 'Umar: Allah's Apostle said, "You (i.e. Muslims) will fight with the Jews till some of them will hide behind stones. The stones will (betray them) saying, 'O 'Abdullah (i.e. slave of Allah)! There is a Jew hiding behind me; so kill him.' " [Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 176 ]

Shalom, Yibel

Will48 said...

An Anthem

Free People of the World, Unite!
Against Jihadi Genocide
Free Will and Candor will Prevail
Against the bloody Muslim Hell

We Choose the Freedom of the Thought
To Muslim Beast we Bow Not
Each individual is precious
Responsible he’s and courageous

Let the Thousand Flowers blossom
Fear Not the vile Colossus
We will smash it into dust
Overcome the Lies we must

Against the darkest of the Nights
We Choose our Might and we are Right
We’re Free as long We Do No Harm
We care and tend for our young

We stand Opposed to the Oppression
To weak and gentle our Protection
The wicked Lies reject we must
In God of Truth we put our Trust.


Anonymous said...

Islamophobia is the immune system of Civilization.

Anonymous said...

I understand Genghis had some remarkable success. Near total ...

Post a Comment