Monday, January 06, 2014

The Muslim Suicide Convert

Both of the suicide bombers who struck in Russia were Muslim converts. They follow a long string of Muslim terrorist converts, including the murderers of British soldier Lee Rigby who were sentenced last month and Terry Lee Loewen who plotted to car bomb the Wichita Mid-Continent Airport that same month.

Muslim converts engage in terrorism at a higher rate than Muslims. It's gotten so bad that converting to Islam is almost a form of suicide.

The popular theory is that Muslim terrorist groups use converts because they blend in better. But in most Western countries, screening by race is nearly illegal and in even in targeted countries where it isn’t, there are usually many members of Muslim ethnic groups in most major cities.

There are four reasons for the rise of the Muslim Suicide Convert. Muslim converts are gullible, fanatical, suicidal and expendable.

Let's start with the last one first. Muslims usually come from tribal cultures with extended family groups. Despite its claims of transnationalism and multiculturalism, Islam is an ethnic religion with the descendants of Mohammed elevated over everyone else, the families in the region of his first conquests elevated over other Arabs, Arabs elevated over non-Arabs, Asian Muslims over African Muslims and African Muslims over Western converts to Islam.

A convert to Islam is lowest on the totem pole because he has no family group. In a tribal society, not having a family connection makes you an outsider and expendable. A Muslim who Jihads himself to death creates a hole in the tribal network of arranged cousin marriages, illegal business arrangements and other extended family support structures. A Muslim convert was never part of the network unless he married into it. And even then he can easily be unplugged because he has no common ancestry with them.

In a Muslim country, he can be killed without having to pay blood price. In a Western country, he can be sent off to die without the "tribe" of Pakistanis or Egyptians who built the mosques and hired the Imams who converted him and convinced him to kill non-Muslims being affected by his death.

He is expendable.

Converts are not part of the family networks of the Muslim settlers in their Western diasporas. That makes them useful cannon fodder. If they are captured, the mosque denies all responsibility and blames the internet even though most mosques and Muslim student groups host those same speakers who "radicalize" converts over the internet at their own facilities and events.

Muslim converts are also suicidal.

The act of conversion is a form of death. It destroys the entire cultural and faith background of the individual. It cuts him off from his family, his people and his way of life. Conversion can be constructive, but it should never be forgotten that it is also destructive.

The Muslim convert has been trying to kill himself all his life to some degree, to destroy the essence of what he is to overcome that perceived flaw preventing him from being happy and living a worthwhile life. Islam is his drug and alcohol abuse, his meaningless sex and his cult. It is how he punishes himself hoping to find redemption in self-destruction and meaning in the sacrifice of the self to the first utterly devouring and consuming thing that comes along.

Converts to Islam often discuss feeling empty. They expect Islam to fill the void within them and when it does not, they are told that the failure is theirs.

The Muslim convert finds Islam in a search for fulfillment and then still feeling unfulfilled, seeks out its "purer" forms whose commitment to Jihadist violence is more overt. The violence of their rhetoric and the force of their commitment briefly feel like fulfillment, but then dissatisfaction sets in again. Told to blame himself for this final failure, the Muslim Suicide Convert is encouraged to make his final kamikaze run hoping to find the meaning and fulfillment in the afterlife that evaded him in this life.

Muslim converts have personal problems that they try to treat with Islam the way that sufferers from conventional diseases try to treat their illnesses with phony cures. Muslim clerics promise that Islam will solve the personal problems of non-Muslims and non-Muslim societies, but like so many criminal gurus, they are peddling phony cures that kill the patient.

That is one reason why Muslim converts are fanatical. Another reason is that they have no baseline. Converts plunge into another religion and culture as into deep water.

Muslims have learned to make the necessary compromises with their fanatical religion that make their lives livable. That is why most of them do not go out and blow themselves up; instead they undermine Western societies in slower and steadier ways through demographics, disinformation and political influence.

The Muslim Suicide Convert seeks an uncompromising purity. He rejects the compromises that Muslims have learned to make over the centuries. Seeking the core revelation in a religion of death; he finds that revelation only in death. The truth of Islam is in its killing fields. It preaches war for power and paradise. The Muslim convert who searches for its essence finds a grinning skull in the desert sands and hurries to emulate its terrible example.

Finally, Muslim converts are gullible. The natives of every land have games that they play with tourists, relying on their unfamiliarity with another culture to mislead them and trick them. Muslim converts are strangers in a strange land, slowly learning a foreign way of life and pathetically eager to be accepted by another culture. It is all too easy for Muslim clerics to lead them down the garden path to the suicide bomber’s paradise by offering and withholding affection until they are willing to do anything to belong.

Muslim Suicide Converts are enlisted in a war the way that men have been enlisted in wars throughout the ages with appeals to patriotism, strategic shaming, tales of outrageous atrocities and myths of incredible heroism. The Muslim clerics, like so many military recruiters before them, tailor their pitch to the disposable people who are least likely to question orders and the least likely to be missed.

 Muslim recruiters thrive on campus for the same reasons as cult recruiters and leftist academics.

The modern university is a good place to find insecure young people questioning everything that they believe in and unsure of what to do when they have destroyed everything they were and found that their impulse to ridicule and tear down everything does not fulfill the human need for something to believe in. It is where young men and women seeking to find something beyond their limits, experimenting with and becoming someone they are not and feeling inward guilt and loss at the abandonment of their old selves and their old values can be hunted and trapped.

Into this universe of doubt, the Muslim cleric intrudes with his false offer of certainty, with the air of the victim, the badge of the underdog, the mysticism of the east and the romance of the grass, that like the terrorist flags that wave among it, always grows greener on the other side of the world.

Westernized Muslims are urged to recommit to Islam, to steel themselves for the coming conflict between the civilizations of the sword and the microchip, to purge themselves of Western culture, embrace the black flags and atone for their beers they drank, the girls they kissed and the songs they sang with the death screams of sirens and the blood of their non-Muslim friends and neighbors.

The seduction of the non-Muslim runs more slowly but surely. The dissatisfied and unhappy, those trained by a liberal culture contemptuous of its own values and traditions to instinctively value non-Western spirituality over their own "materialistic" and "imperialistic" religions, are lured in.

The children of an intellectual tradition that taught them to reject absolutes of any kind as the worst sin of the mind, embrace with fervor an absolutism that calls for their deaths and the death of the world. They kill and die, destroying their own bodies poisoned by their infidel heritage and in dying, inflict as much harm as they can on the infidel society whose destruction their cult seeks.

The Muslim Suicide Convert embraces his role as the vanguard of a spiritual world order, destroying the oppressive materialism of the world to make way for the superior rule of Islamic law, believing that he can only overcome his own materialism by destroying his material substance and the material substance of the society that nurtured someone as unworthy as him in the ultimate act of submission that throbs with the death drive of the Islamic religion of submission

Only by destroying his physical being and the physical being of his society, does the Muslim Suicide Convert expect to achieve the transcendence of his physicality and the fulfillment that the gross substance of his flesh barred him from. His suicide is also a national suicide. It is the extension of the national suicide, the act of profound and terrible self-destruction that brought the Muslim preachers who worked on his mind into the country and into its universities.

The Muslim Suicide Convert, like his Islam-friendly liberal society, kills himself and his society to atone for its materialism, reaching instead for a material paradise of virgin demon women, young boys serving wine and rivers and hills made of the bounties of seventh century Arabia, drowning his guilt in death and his hope for eternity in the innocent blood of his victims.

The crime he commits is not his alone. It is not only that of the Imams who turned him, who preached at him and poisoned his heart. It is not only that of the Saudis and Qataris who funded them, the Muslim diasporas who try to have it both ways balancing Western materialism and Muslim terrorism in ways that profit them most and the scowling men who ushered in his final stage of life in some dirty apartment in a failed industrial town or basement mosque where sellers of cheap food gather on their rugs and gossip about their cousins and their governments.

It is also that of the political leaders who welcomed in the Islamic cultural engine of destruction that has been assembled and turned on its cities, sputtering to life with clouds of black smoke, belching out mosques and mega-mosques run by the grimmest men of the theological academies of Mohammedanism, religious feuds and warriors, bombs and beheadings, restarting the process that filled the desert with armed riders and corpses.

No suicide bomber acts alone. It is not only his hand or the hand of the remote handler or that of the distant oil-soaked states, Sunni and Shiite, glaring across the Persian Gulf at each other.

It is the hand of his own leaders, his politicians, his teachers, his clergy and his entertainers who do this terrible thing.

It is everyone who advocates for Islamic immigration while covering up its crimes, who calls for more tolerance and more mosques and more Islamic law and then rushes to the scene of the bombing before the blood and tissue of the innocent victims of Islamic immigration have hardly been scraped off the sidewalk to announce that Islam had nothing to do with this act of Islamic terror.

They have made the process that led to this terrible moment possible and it is they who flock to the scene of their own crime to cover up the innocent blood spilled by their own immigration policies.

The Muslim Suicide Convert is the spawn of a Muslim Suicide Convert leadership and a Muslim Convert society. The individual convert sees more clearly than they do the consequences of their actions and the darkness that waits on the other side of the door that they have opened. He knows that death is on the other side of it and he walks toward it into the act of destruction and self-destruction that his political and cultural leaders have made possible while averting their eyes at the moment that the ticking bomb that they have allowed to be imported and assembled in their country explodes.


Aurini said...

I often see comments in the Manosphere advocating for Islam, as a way to combat feminism.

Nothing could be further from the truth.

The structure of Muslim relationships isn't a happy balance between the masculine and the feminine, rather it is the rise of the petty male tyranny, mirrored by the petty female tyranny happening behind closed doors. Where Christianity advocates female submission and male leadership (in that order), Islam advocates male violence and female obeisance (in that order).

On the surface it looks like Muslim males control their women, but in practice they're a bunch of weak, sycophants desperate for female attention, and only able to express it through misogyny; the women, meanwhile, take out all of their abuse on their male children, raising the next generation of emotionally-damaged people.

The healthy Muslims are the ones who embrace Christian and Jewish relationship practices (or, in the Eastern parts of their Empire, Hindu and Buddhist practices) despite what the Koran says. But without the examples set by other cultures, these healthy Muslims would quickly vanish into barbarism.

Daniel Greenfield @ the Sultan Knish blog said...

That's a very good summary. The Muslim home is a vicious power struggle. The Muslim woman tries to have as many children as possible so her husband won't be able to afford another wife. The Muslim man is constantly dreaming of Western women or of Jihad because he can't stand the burdens of his household.

Islam is also not very masculine. There's a reason you have off the scale homosexuality in Muslim societies.

These don't exactly convey masculinity

Anonymous said...

So why would anyone convert to Islam in the first place? It automatically places the person under suspicion of being a terrorist to begin with among LEO/intelligence agencies but also the public.

Slightly OT but Little Mosque on the Prairie had an episode in their first season called The Convert. It's was funny, and the Imam told the congregation that converts needed a while to calm down (face it, converts from one faith to another can be a bit much). But in the episode, the convert is run out of the mosque when he becomes totally obnoxious to the congregation.

But being an obnoxious convert to most religions doesn't result in violence. In Islam it does. BTW, didn't the Boston Marathon bomber become more radicalized by an American convert to Islam?


Dallas said...

Noni Darwish's excellent book "Cruel and Usual Punishment" discusses the abuse and conditioning of Muslim children on both sexes, how the kids learn from their parents' behavior and thence how the dysfunctional attitudes replicate through the generations.

Excellent article on Suicide Converts. Related is a documentary I saw a while ago on "Jihadi Sheilas" - Australian women converts attracted to the ultimate bad-boys - Islamic terrorists.

mushroom said...

Very insightful. Thank you. I also got around to reading your previous post on Diversity, which is something everybody needs to read and understand.

Anonymous said...

that would be the ultimate bad-boy. these women are playing with fire


parisclaims said...

Virtually every willing convert has a personality disorder, usually serious.

Leah said...

Saw a video of Muslim school with male teacher and covered up women teachers. The teacher was hitting the kids for not doing well on their assignment while the cameraman was laughing. the teacher was hitting the female children worse than the boys and it was so sad.
The female children were crying and cowering. What a horrible upbringing let alone the rapes, FGM and infant sodomy, forced marriages and beheadings.
I cannot for the life of me imagine why any person from a civilized country would want to convert to a animal like culture....truly pere adam (wild man)

Anonymous said...

I used to socialize with a small group of people in their later 40's/early fifties. One of the men had a son who converted to Islam. Another gentleman had a son who converted to Mormonism to marry a Mormon girl. The people in this group all commiserated with the man whose son joined the LDS church--"Oh, that must be so hard for you," "What a crazy thing to do," "You must be so worried about your future grandkids," etc. But to the man whose son converted to Islam, they were all oh-so-tolerant: "How interesting!" "What have you learned from him?" "You must find it so fascinating to learn more about it!" All in admiring tones. By the way, the man with the Mormon son had not exactly raised him in any religion, so it wasn't like he (the son) had turned his back on the (fill in the blank) church. He embraced a new one. Ditto with the Moslem son--Daddy had raised him as a "free spirit" to "explore" the "possibilities" of "All religions." (If only he had joined the Baha'i instead...)

Crazy people....

Anonymous said...

I am grateful for the clarity you always provide. The converts are just the endgame extension of a Western culture that is being destroyed from within. Our identities are being lost in the present denigration of our Judeo- Christian heritage and all its traditions. Sex and food are the new religions and distractions. Meanwhile the danger of cultural suicide is all around us but we do not see. We as a society have invited the enemy through the gates and refuse to recognize him for what he is.

Strelnikov said...

There is an old saying, "There is no zealot like a convert."

Until we can admit that Islam is the enemy, not deluded converts or a "small %" who openly support jihad, we will get nowhere in containing it.

Anonymous said...

Why convert to most religions? Protestant/Catholics killed millions in their religious extremism. Burning, torturing maiming and killing others for centuries.
As Leah said you would have to be willingly ignorant of the past of these religions to take part in them.
No good God endorses murder, torture and the like.
Islam, Protestantism, Catholicism all share vile pasts.

Anonymous said...

"Islam, Protestantism, Catholicism all share vile pasts."

Not to change the subject, but blacks in America were once enslaved by whites. What does this fact have to do with present white Americans? Are whites eager to reinstate slavery? Or have we (mostly) learned from our mistakes and resolved to move on?

crowsbeak said...

Willing submission to adult-onset mohammedanism should surely be seen as a sign of an underlying personality disorder.

In particular, willing female submissives, on the look out for a bit of the old fifty shades of mohammed, are usually self-loathing, binge purge bulimics or such like (in my experience). And as for the supposed 'male' submissive, post-colonial guilt ridden, passive aggressive, petit bourgeois soya boys vicariously acting their 'noble savage' fantasies (in my experience).

Anonymous said...

And which one still has a vile present?

larry said...


Distortion committed by Bukhari whilst copying down a tradition in his ‘Sahih’ pertaining to the legitimacy of sodomy
We read in the Holy Quran:
Your wives are as a tilth unto you; so approach your tilth when or how ye will (Yusufali, 2:223).
In various Sunni works we read that testimony of Abdullah Ibn Umar regarding the reason for the revelation of the said verse qua legitimacy of performing buggery on one’s wife. Hafiz Jalaluddin Suyuuti for example recorded in Tafseer Durre Manthur, Volume 1 page 638:
وأخرج الحسن بن سفيان في مسنده والطبراني في الأوسط والحاكم وأبو نعيم في المستخرج بسند حسن عن ابن عمر قال‏:‏ إنما نزلت على رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم ‏{‏نساؤكم حرث لكم‏.‏‏.‏‏.‏‏}‏ الآية‏.‏ رخصة في إتيان الدبر‏.‏
Hasan bin Sufiyan in his Musnad, Tabarani in Al-Awsat, Hakim and Abu Naeem in Al-Mastakhraj with a ‘Hasan’ chain of narration narrated from Ibn Umar who said: ‘This verse was revealed upon the Holy Prophet (s) in respect of the permissibility of performing sex in the anus of a woman’
Curiously, when it came to the great Imam Bukhari, he felt compelled to record the statement of Abdullah Ibn Umar in an incomplete manner. We read in Sahih Bukhari Volume 6, Book 60, Number 50:
Narrated Nafi’: Whenever Ibn ‘Umar recited the Qur’an, he would not speak to anyone till he had finished his recitation. Once I held the Qur’an and he recited Surat-al-Baqara from his memory and then stopped at a certain Verse and said, “Do you know in what connection this Verse was revealed? ” I replied, “No.” He said, “It was revealed in such-and-such connection.” Ibn ‘Umar then resumed his recitation. Nafi added regarding the Verse:–”So go to your tilth when or how you will” Ibn ‘Umar said, “It means one should approach his wife in ..”
‘In’ what? Of course IN her anus and whilst Hafiz Jalaluddin Suyuti and other famed Sunni scholars recorded this fact, it was Imam Ibn Hajar Asqalani who filled in the blanks whilst commenting on the cited tradition of Bukhari:
في إتيان المرأة في دبرها
“Approach the woman in her anus”
Fatah ul Bari Sharah Sahih Bukhari, Volume 8 page 190
Imam Bukhari has recorded this tradition in his ‘Sahih’ with the following chain of narration:
Ishaq (bin Rehwiya) – Nadar – Ibn Aun – Nnaf’i
Now the most interesting part is that Bukhari actually copied down the above statement of Abdullah Ibn Umar from his Shaykh, namely Ishaq bin Rehwiya as mentioned by Ibn Hajar Asqalani:
فقد أخرجها إسحاق ابن راهويه في مسنده وفي تفسيره بالإسناد المذكور ، وقال بدل قوله حتى انتهى إلى مكان ” حتى انتهى إلى قوله نساؤكم حرث لكم فأتوا حرثكم أنى شئتم فقال : أتدرون فيما أنزلت هذه الآية ؟ قلت لا . قال : نزلت في إتيان النساء في أدبارهن
Ishaq bin Raheweh recorded it in his Musnad and his Tafsir with the same chain, when it reached the part “your wives are tilth to you, so go to your tilth anyhow you will” he said: ‘Do you know what for this verse has been revealed about?’ They said: ‘No’. He replied: ‘It has been revealed in regards to approaching women in their anuses’
Interestingly whilst citing the said tradition verbatim Bukhari committed deception and did not quote the words of his Shaykh opting to leave a blank, in the hope that the attention plan of his readers would be short enough to confuse them and direct them to the next narration.

larry said...

So why would anyone convert to Islam in the first place?





Khalid Hasan, Daily Times, May 17, 2006
Here are the Muslim countries and how they placed in the top five world ranking of various bestiality-related internet search terms:[8]
Pig Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Egypt (No. 2) Saudi Arabia (No. 3)
Donkey Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Iran (No. 3) Saudi Arabia (No. 4)
Dog Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Saudi Arabia (No. 3)
Cat Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Iran (No. 2) Egypt (No. 3) Saudi Arabia (No. 4)
Horse Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Turkey (No. 3)
Cow Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Iran (No. 2) Saudi Arabia (No. 4)
Goat Sex: Pakistan (No. 1)
Animal Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Morocco (No. 2) Iran (No. 4) Egypt (No. 5)
Snake Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Malaysia (No. 3) Indonesia (No. 4) Egypt (No. 5)
Monkey Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Indonesia (No. 3) Malaysia (No. 4)
Bear Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Saudi Arabia (No. 2)
Elephant Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Egypt (No. 3) United Arab Emirates (No. 4) Malaysia (No. 5)
Fox Sex: Saudi Arabia (No. 1) Turkey (No. 4)


Bestiality is common among boys of tribal Arab cultures.
Miner and DeVos (1960) comment that amongst Arab tribal cultures, "Bestiality with goats, sheep, or camels provides another outlet. These practices are not approved but they are recognized as common among boys." Havelock-Ellis [note 52] states "The Arabs, according to Kocher, chiefly practice bestiality with goats, sheep and mares. The Annamites, according to Mondiere, commonly employ sows and (more especially the young women) dogs."
Historical And Cultural Perspectives On Zoophilia
Serving History
There is also a certain saying which remains popular among the Arabs:
The Arabs have never taken quite so condemnatory an attitude towards the practice, and indeed a popular Arab saying had it that

"The pilgrimage to Mecca is not complete without copulating with the camel."


In June 2011, a male who was caught having sex with another man's donkey was fined Rs 50,000. This fine was not imposed for having sex with an animal, but for committing adultery. The raped donkey was labelled a 'kari' (an adultress) and eventually honor killed by its owner.

Incredible though it may sound, a donkey was declared 'Kari' and shot dead here in a remote area on Monday. The Jirga imposed 110,000 rupees fine on the alleged 'Karo'.
The reports said that in Village Ghahi Khan Jatoi, a villager Ghazi Khan alias Malang shot dead his donkey on being 'Kari' with Sikandar Ali alias Deedo. He attempted to kill Sikander too but the alleged Karo managed to escape and surrendered himself to an influential person of the area.
Sources said the influential person summoned both the parties and imposed 110,000 rupees fine on the Karo. They said Sikander and his family were forced to pay Rs 50,000 on the spot and the remaining amount in two installments.
The sources added that the alleged Karo pleaded innocence at the Jirga, but the Jirga members paid no attention to it. Sikander's family said he paid Rs 50,000 to save his life otherwise he would have been killed.
Donkey declared 'Kari' killed

Anonymous said...

Brilliant article, brilliantly written, and very revealing about the definition of evil. From a religious or non-religious point of view, the very meaning of DEVIL in its Greek etymology is the DIA BALLO, something or someone that seeks to overthrow your own self, and to upset it to the point it needs to be replaced with its evil counterpart. Exactly the following passage: "It is where young men and women seeking to find something beyond their limits, experimenting with and becoming someone they are not and feeling inward guilt and loss at the abandonment of their old selves and their old values can be hunted and trapped."

Post a Comment