Articles

Monday, October 05, 2009

Gilad Shalit - Human Weakness in the Face of Terrorism

Muslim terrorists pride themselves on their amorality. On having no individual sense of right or wrong, only the abstract codes of Islamic law that can be modified at will to allow terrorists to do virtually anything to anyone, so long as it is in the name of the Jihad.


The atrocities of Jihadists around the world, whether it is beheading schoolgirls or contractors, murdering teachers, blowing up buses, murdering babies, torturing hostages to death or blowing themselves up in cafes; is not simply about achieving a tactical goal. In most cases there is no practical goal to be achieved through these acts except terror. And that is the point. The goal of terrorism is terror, to intimidate your enemies through monstrous and inhuman acts. And Muslim terrorists pride themselves on being monsters, on transforming themselves into creatures capable of the worst bestial acts, culminating in the ritual of human sacrifice that has become so vital to the cult of death that is Islam's Jihad, the suicide bombing.

By contrast Muslim terrorists sneer at the human weaknesses of their enemies, their genuine love for their families and their fear for their safety, their love of life and their willingness to show mercy and to trust. And Muslim terrorists and infiltrators are the first to take advantage, to play on and exploit these qualities. Qualities which they themselves only mime. A true committed Islamist will show love or concern for his family, mercy or trust for non-Muslims only as a propaganda ploy. This ploy will be set aside in seconds when it suits him. The father who moments ago was bewailing his wounded child, will grab and use him as a human shield. He will plunge a knife into the neck of his Western friend and co-worker who has been at his house dozens of times and played with his children. He will feel nothing while doing it, only a sense of triumph and pride in his devotion to Islam.

All this has happened over and over again, and will go on happening, because Islamists are taught and trained to only have one love and one passion, Islam. Any human attachments are purely secondary and easily discarded. Any human concepts of guilt or morality are buried.

Islamic law frees the terrorist from all human norms. He may kill, rob or rape. He may take on any disguise, drink alcohol, curse and commit every act explicitly prohibited by the Koran or the Hadiths. He can indulge his appetites in every way, so long as in exchange he is willing to kill and die in the name of the Jihad. That is the devil's bargain that forges an active Islamic terrorist, an amoral cunning entity who has only one ultimate goal, to corrupt, divide and kill the enemies of Allah.

It is vitally important that we understand this because every sign of human weakness we show to Islamic terrorists is exactly like cutting our arms and lowering them into shark infested waters. The Jihad thrives on human weakness, because its acolytes are militarily incompetent, but compensate for it in sheer ruthlessness. Mohammed did not turn his combination of desert hallucinations and shameless plagiarisms into a dominant religion by legitimately defeating his enemies. He used lies, deceit, treachery, false promises, terror and banditry to win his way to the top, in a region already excelling in lies, deceit and treachery. Modern day Muslims are his inheritors in that regard.

Every sign of human weakness is another drop of blood in the water. If we begin an investigation when a Muslim child is killed in a firefight with terrorists, there will be a dozen children being used as human shields in the next firefight. If a dead soldier causes us to question our purpose, then they will do everything possible to kill individual soldiers, even though there is no useful tactical purpose and their losses in such encounters vastly exceed ours. If a Muslim being removed wrongly off a plane triggers protests, then the next time there will be a dozen Muslims, pushing and testing our security. If we are willing to do everything possible to get our hostages released, then hostage taking will dramatically increase.

The Jihad zeroes in on human weakness. The more human weakness we show, the worse we will bleed. At one point Israel understood this, but no longer. The tragic farce of Gilad Shalit's captivity is likely to end shortly at the cost of freeing terrorists with blood on their hands, giving Hamas a definitive victory, and Israel a definitive defeat. The same Israeli left wing media that has made it so hard for IDF soldiers to operate against terrorists, have turned Shalit's captivity into a circus, transforming him from warrior to martyr. And when Hamas scores its vital victory, it is unknown how many Israeli soldiers and civilians will once again wind up paying the price.


Israel's willingness to do anything to bring a soldier home is laudable, it expresses higher humane values as well as true religious ones, but it is also inherently self-destructive. Armies exist as part of a bigger picture. To treat every soldier as a civilian, is to preemptively surrender any conflict. To make every soldier into a negotiating counter for X amount of terrorists, only insures further attacks against IDF soldiers. If Gilad Shalit is released, it will not be long before Hamas begins planning to seize more soldiers. And that is inevitable, when you pay the ransom, you motivate the kidnappers.

Latin America, the Middle East and parts of Asia and the Caucasus have a thriving market in kidnappings. The market thrives because there is a profit motive. If you keep paying off kidnappers, the kidnappings will keep on coming. The key difference between Mexico and the United States is that when kidnappings happen in Mexico, the family cuts a deal, while in the United States they call the police. Israel's willingness to cut deals for the bodies of its soldiers has created a thriving market for terrorists in Israeli soldiers. Dead or alive.

The Jihad against Israel has not resulted in military victories, only in victories of terror. Arafat and his cronies did not win territory in a war. They won it through the classic two-faced approach of terrorism, by showing a demonic killer's face to the general public, and a conciliatory "Let's Negotiate Approach" to foreign diplomats and the press. That approach paid off. It continued to pay off as Arafat brought in his henchmen and then spent the next decade or so terrorizing and murdering Israelis, while living off European and American foreign aid and political support. It was only when Sharon turned the tables by going on the offensive after the Passover bombings that Fatah imploded. And now Hamas has taken its place.

Hamas is a crossbreed of the worst strains of Jihadism. Emerging out of the Muslim Brotherhood, kissing cousin to Al Queda, and backed by Shiite Iran, it is just not just an Iranian proxy, its DNA is also comprised of the original strain of the Will to Caliphate. For Muslims that represents the Kingdom of Heaven on earth, a perfect political state that functions according to the pure will of Allah as embodied by Sharia law. Hamas has demonstrated patience, waiting out Fatah's decline, pushing it into competitive terrorism against Israel that eventually brought down Fatah, leaving it as little more than a European and American puppet. That makes Hamas extremely dangerous. And it makes showing any weakness toward it, deadly.

It is tempting for Netanyahu to try and untangle the Gordian knot of the Iranian bomb abroad and Hamas terrorism at home, highlighted by the plight of Gilad Shalit with a deal. Having gone this far, it's all but certain that his government will go all the way. Captured soldiers have always held a special place in the hearts of Israelis, and that kind of moral omnipotence that Israelis believe will allow them to defend themselves without ever sullying the purity of arms and bring back every man at any cost, has been precisely the weakness that terrorists have been exploiting for much too long.

Meanwhile Hamas is all too aware of the political weaknesses of democracy, of Netanyahu's need to shore up his position with something tangible. It is politically cheaper to trade terrorists for a captured soldier, than to try to once again send in forces into Gaza in the hopes of finding one man. And that sort of weakness too is what the enemy is counting on. Netanyahu will need the backing of the Israeli public when he has to make the tough call on Iran, but gaining that backing the cheap way by bargaining for Gilad Shalit is likely to prove to be a mistake. Appeasement may seem like a politically convenient shortcut, but its full price weighs heavy with time. By negotiating with Hamas, Israel has legitimized the idea of negotiating with it as if it were a legitimate entity. That same approach is how Arafat and his thugs ended up running a sizable portion of Israel.


What must be understood is that we cannot compromise in the face of terrorism. We can only defy it with our every breath. In the face of a ruthless and amoral ideology that lives only to conquer, plots to undermine, enslave and destroy... any compromise with terrorism is a surrender to it, and a way of enabling its final goals. Terrorism can never be tolerated, appeased or surrendered to. Only pushed further and further back at any cost. The Jihadist must understand that every one of his actions will result in an unequal reaction by a factor of a thousandfold. Against his attempt to transform himself into a monster into a thing without conscience or morals, he should be prepared to be treated as a thing, not as a person. And no weakness can be shown to it, nor can it be negotiated with any more than one can sit down and talk with a rabid dog. There is only one solution to a rabid dog problem. There is only one solution to a terrorist problem. The difference between the two is that the rabid dog cannot think, the terrorist can. And he waits for any sign of weakness to tell him the best way to strike at you. To strike at us.

11 comments:

Mary said...

Israel needs to make me dictator for a week.
I would bomb the living daylights out of Gaza til they released Galid or until Gaza resembles a strip mining operation.

If they kill him,
their blood would be on their own heads and I would wipe them out root and branch.

Devorah said...

Let's vote Mary in!
LOL

Keli Ata said...

Mary for PM!


OT--is it my imagine or did I see Gilad Shalit on TV reading from a prepared statement? I was half asleep watching the news so I can't be sure if it was a dream or not.

Sam said...

"If you keep paying off kidnappers, the kidnappings will keep on coming."

Or, as Kipling put it:
"That if once you have paid him the Dane-geld
You never get rid of the Dane."

And indeed:
"For the end of that game is oppression and shame,
And the nation that plays it is lost!”

Every payoff, every forced concession, is another turn in that game.

http://ghostwolf.dyndns.org/words/authors/K/KiplingRudyard/verse/english_history/danegeld.html

A Jew With A View said...

Yes, I have to say I agree with your comments about Israel's stance on rescuing soldiers. For a long time, I agreed with their dedication to doing everything possible to get every last man back, but I realise now it just puts all other soldiers and civilians in even more danger.

It is not fair to the victims of the terrorists who will be released, either. These men are in prison for a reason. Surely Operation Cast Lead was the time to get Gilad Shalit out or confirm he's no longer alive?

I feel so desperately sorry for the Shalit family - and for G-d forbid the families of future Israeli hostages, if Israel doesn't change its stance.

Sultan Knish said...

Yes, we're talking about terrorists with blood on their hands. Even the murderer of Minister Zeevi.

Anonymous said...

I agree 100% with your article but I have been called a hypocrite for saying the same thing. The attack was on my children, would I speak the same way if it was my child? It's a kind of low blow, because each person thinks of themselves and what if it was their close family, then you become irrational and no "for the good of society" would chage ones mind if it was personal.

Sultan Knish said...

It's a valid point, but personal stakes cannot come at other people's expense. One man cannot buy the freedom of his son at the cost of other people's sons.

susan_rakes said...

Standing Ovation for that one Sultan. An excellent and insightful comment.
Is it not ironic that the cost for all our sons and daughters has already been bought and paid for. Some 2,000 years ago. I saw that video of Gilad Shalit--with the prepared statement. I was shocked to see he was still living. THAT I never expected. Have to say that I give Bibi 50 gazillion kudos for calling out the holocaust deniers and pulling the rug out from underneath the pretenders who still chose to sit there after Obama and Ahmadinejad.

Will48 said...

I actually think it is one of the key issues for us to resolve if we're to prevail in this coming new war with the new old Evil.

We should once again treat our way of life as an ideology worth dying for, the ideology of the Right of Everyone to live the life of Goodness, Fairness and Freedom.

The key question is this: threatened with your child being killed, would you kill another child in his place?

One famous Israeli female radio broadcaster actually shouted YES DOZENS OF THEM after raising this question herself - exactly in the context of Shalit affair.

I call it moral depravity. It's the same with Shalit, as with children. Trading him, is helping Hamas, is helping Hamas to kill more.

Simple. Clear.

We need to reach THAT level of moral clarity to prevail over the Islamist Evil. We need to raise ourselves to become truly sentient rational beings, not just these biological beings driven by instinct.

We, as a whole, as a civilization.

Faced with the question, "and what if it was their close family, then you become irrational", our answer should be immediate and unwavering:

Each individual is precious. We can't trade one for another.

http://reasonresponsibilityandchoice.blogspot.com/2008/12/anthem.html

Sultan Knish said...

yes indeed, the survival test of a society is a rational moral compass

without it, it's simply an endocrine system without a brain

Post a Comment