Articles

Sunday, October 29, 2006

The Muslim Mind is the Mind of a Rapist

The nation's most senior Muslim cleric blamed immodestly dressed women who don't wear Islamic headdress for being preyed on by men and likened them to abandoned "meat" that attracts voracious animals. In a Ramadan sermon, Sydney-based Sheik Taj Din al-Hilali also alluded to the infamous Sydney gang rapes, suggesting the attackers were not entirely to blame.

Sheik Hilali said there were women who "sway suggestively" and wore make-up and immodest dress ... "and then you get a judge without mercy (rahma) and gives you 65 years". "But the problem, but the problem all began with who?" he asked. "If you take out uncovered meat and place it outside on the street, or in the garden or in the park, or in the backyard without a cover, and the cats come and eat it ... whose fault is it, the cats or the uncovered meat?

"The uncovered meat is the problem." The sheik then said: "If she was in her room, in her home, in her hijab, no problem would have occurred."

He said women were "weapons" used by "Satan" to control men."

A common Muslim claim is to say how much Islam provides rights for women, how much Islam respects women. The truth is very different and the clerics displays that truth.

To a Muslim a woman's body is meat, disgusting but made desirable by Satan to men. Women are nothing more than walking talking meat whose presence corrupts men and makes them sin. The only place a woman belongs is at home, in her room, wearing her Hijab. Anything else makes her fair game for rapists.

Mohammed himself said that most of the inhabitants of hell are women. Muslim scholars have described women as animals whom Allah gave the power of speech so they could interact with men for reproductive purposes.

Muslims see women the same way they see America and Europe, dirty, disgusting, satanic but desirable. They do not integrate into American or European society because they do not love their new countries, they despise them but desire them for their material and physical abundance. Their relation to these countries is not love but lust fused with hatred into a desire to rape.

Along with the gang rape epidemic across Europe and Australia comes the rhetoric. In France Muslim rappers write songs that speak of raping France like a woman. When they loot, burn and kill in Paris or Sydney, it is that same perverted desire that drives them. They cannot become Americans or Europeans for the very same reason they cannot love a woman. Love or citizenship in a democratic nation with values demands virtues of them they do not have. So they turn rapist instead.

While Europe and America fruitlessly woo Muslims, the Muslims only grow more vicious and demanding. They cannot understand that these nations want to genuinely accept them and welcome them into their family. They see only an invitation to brutality. Europe is burning and America is next and still our politicians continue to coo to the Muslims beasts marauding through the streets in the hopes of making them see their beauty, offering every compromise, until tragically and finally, they have nothing left.

12 comments:

Dr. Vincent B. said...

Rape is not done from desire.
This is a common falacy proven 100% wrong by psychology.
Rape is a crime commited by a perverted mine who craves to hurt, humiliate and degrade the victim.

The vast majority of rape victims are not what the world would consider attractive, desireable women.
They are instead young children and older women as well.
Rape is an act done by someone who has no morals and no soul.

Men who doubt their own masculinity are thought to have rape urges.
Middle eastern men are not made like other men, sadly, and this is humiliating to them. Which is why so many of them survived castration at the hands of the Ottoman Empire (it was the Ottoman hobby). There was not much there to castrate and so it was of little importance to them.
Indeed it can be difficult to tell a male of arab descent from a woman when they are naked.
This is why they are so heavily clothed and you rarely see muslim men naked .

Lous DePalma said...

From a scholarly report on the dark perverted minds of rapists:

....The findings suggested that the more men were abused as children, the more they were likely to rape as adults.

In addition, these men typically had "an earlier sexual initiation, sometimes forced, and endorsed myths about rape such as the notion that if you know the woman, it's not rape," said Dr. Koss, who conducted the survey with Dr. Malamuth. "They are also more likely to socialize with other men who see women as sexual objects, and like to keep score of their sexual conquests."

Sexual molestation of children by their parents in Arab homes is quite common according to another report.

Keliata said...

Every attempt by the media, liberals to coddle muslims and their lifestyle of death and violence only victimizes other muslims/arabs by giving it their stamp of approval.

If these atrocities were happening in Jewish, Catholic or Mormon communities they would be roundly criticized and lambasted in the media. But Muslims? No, no, can't say a word. Anyone who does gets accused of not understanding their culture, of being intolerant.

It's sick. No one really questions the immorality of remaining silent in the face of such victimization. Tolerance and silence have become more noble attributes than defending innocent women and children.

yobeeone said...

I'm a firm believer in intolerance. Scum shouldn't be tolerated. In this case, (being totally inspired by watching "The Mummy" at the moment) muzlim men should be mummified while still alive. Preferably in public, so people would know through first hand observation that when the utensil is shoved up the nostril to pull out the brain - there is no brain to pull out.

I'm going back to my movie now, because the only thing coming to my tiny mind is obscenities as I think about what these &*$@# get by with.

catlady said...

well here in the usa a lot of people still think the woman is "asking for it" if she's walking around half naked


I remember reading something by a muslim woman,extolling the virtues of the veil, and how it is all about "woman's digntity"

and I thought about that and I concluded that I don't have a problem with the veil per se but I have a problem with the man throwing the stone that kills a woman for not wearing the veil

and I cetainly have problem with maniacs justifying rape -whether they are muslim or otherwise

in otherwords I am against oppression- but if the woman CHOOSES to wear a veil or a burka well whoopdydoo for her-I could really care less-it's when she is FORCED to do so that it becomes my business

feminists have been speaking out for years about rape, pretty much to deaf ears-but hey, now the muslims are justifying rape so the "rightwing" anti feminist types are finally waking up

and meanwhile we live in such strange times that now we see feminists downplaying rape issues in order to be "culturally tolerant" - go figure

I read somewhere about some frum Jews who threw stones at immodestly dressed women, I don't know if this is true or not so take it with a grain of salt

obviously throwing stones at immodest women is different from raping them? But on the other hand stones CAN kill. Is it okay to kill an immodest woman just don't rape her? Is it okay to harrass immodest women? Is it okay to say that missiles are falling on Israel because women's flesh is not sufficiently covered? (while ignoring men's uncovered flesh and men's wayward eyes looking at pornography and other immodest things)

whatever- it all boils down to the same thing-blaming the woman

what else is new?

Keliata said...

Catlady, I read an article about Jewish men (in Israel) throwing pebbles at women who were immodestly dressed, but I believe it was in a liberal publication. I can't find the source. But that's a far cry from the atrocities commented against muslim women by muslim men. I doesn't come close to things like "honor killings" or rising little girls to become suicide bombers.

Anonymous said...

Amazing how the feminists are so silent.....including all the do-gooder "modern-orthodox" feminists among our people.......not a peep....

Keliata said...

(oops, sorry for the spelling errors/typos. I write too fast when I feel emotional about something.)

Anyways, I can't say that modern orthodox women as a whole or organizations consisting of MO women are silent about the issues you raised, anonymous.


And feminist groups in the US should hang their heads in shame for not being more outspoken. They speak out against female circ but remain silent on arabs beheading women and muslim men raising their little girls to be suicide bombers.

I was channel surfing last night and came across something on a television program (Maximum Extreme or something like that) which showed a muslim woman in Egypt being tried for being unfaithful to her husband. To "prove" her innocence she had to lick three times a spoon that had been heated to over 900 degrees. If her tongue didn't burn or blister she was innocent if it burned and blistered she was guilty and would be punished by having her head chopped off.

Very quickly she licked the spoon and it was announced that she was not guilty. Did she scream out in pain? No. I imagine the terror-induced adrenaline surge enabled her to withstand the ordeal in the short term, sort of the way people can walk on hot coals. I can't imagine the agony she experienced after the fear wore off nor how blistered her tongue later became.

Most feminist organizations in the US are too busy to care about women like her. And criticizing barbaric Islamic practices would conflict with their liberal political agendas.

girlgoyle said...

I think every one is missing one of the most annoying points. It isn't enough, in his mind, for women to be veiled.

He wants them Veiled and in their ROOMS, in their HOMES.

Probably rooms without windows so the men will not be tempted.

Sultan Knish said...

sure, that's how it is in places like saudi arabia already where it's a crime to walk outside unescorted and where women eat behind a curtain when company comes

Scott said...

They're going to come and drag you off for hate/thought crimes pretty soon. Most of us who believe like you will probably just cower in our caves while the loving Libs call for our heads.

scionofzion said...

saying that leaving "meat" uncovered is to blame for the "cat" coming by and eating it means to say that (Arab/Muslim) men are no more than animals driven by, and therefore not fully accountable for, the resulting lustful urges. While we may rhetorically wish to categorize Arabs/Muslims as animals- thereby insulting the animal kingdom- Torah, upon which all of creation rests, of course does not recognize this excuse. No matter the temptation, a G-d fearing person is expected to uphold His laws and moral code.

So by the by, if an Arab man in Egypt or Saudi Arabia sees a boy in a short-sleeved shirt, unveiled, or even swimming bare-chested on the beach or pool, and this man happens to be a homosexual pedophile, will the all-merciful and wise Islamic Courts of Sharia there blame the boy for leading him on if the man then grabs him and has his Michael Jackson way with him? After all, good (looking), little Muslim boys mustn't tempt moral, upstanding Muslim men with their Satanically, good looks.

Post a Comment